And what about Michael? Sims mac os torrent. I think the role of skins in the CSGO gambling problem is a lot like that. Ultimately, either a more specific law is passed, or a Court hears argument from people advocating for either interpretation and makes a decision. Play 30 free 3-reel and 5-reel slots: What i mean by that, if the owners in fact gambled on their own site, what does it mean for all the other gamblers who went against them? The criminal suit would be brought by the government - could be local or federal depends on what law is allegedly being violated.

Аппарат игровой халк

Аппарат crazy fruits

Gta iv vice city rage. Gta liberty city stories hileleri. Gta samp skin id. Gta san andreas 2 multiplayer. Gta san andreas bilinmeyen sifreleri. Gta san andreas hileleri onkare. Gta san andreas spawn. Gta san andres oyunu. Gta vice city rp. Gta vice city russian invasion. Gta vice city underground 2 Pc. Http gta samp ru. Http torrents m sk ru. Http www torrents local forum. Microsoft visio torrent. Minecraft 05 0 ios. Minecraft zone 10 0. Rfrfz dthcbz l fdye yf kz vfqyrhfanfs. Shararam cheat 1 0.

Sims mac os torrent. Skacati kartinki na minecraft na robocii stol. Smirn a narod2 ru. Vbybrhfan rfr cltkfnm kjlre. Vegas casino 12 pack soliter. Information exchanged in this forum does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. It is possible this post could be considered attorney advertising, but it is not our purpose to solicit an individual or group to become a client. Specific facts, applicable law, and other considerations will always affect every circumstance, and thus you should always seek the advice of an attorney on every specific situation before moving forward.

Also, please recognize that we may be unable to answer some questions because they are too specific, or because providing an answer may conflict with the interests of our current clients or our ethical obligations.

In some cases, we may have to decline to answer without providing a reason. We are all American attorneys. Prior results do not guarantee similar future outcomes. Lawyers, I personally have gambled skins before, I'm over age and can so it's not something illegal for me to do. My question is, is this technically gambling? The reason I ask this is because in Florida we have had this lawsuit between the government and "arcade owners".

The Arcades are basically slot machines but you get gift cards and not cash if you win. The courts found the Arcades ok since gift cards are not considered monetary value. This is a great question, and should probably be higher up. When it comes to skin betting, there is a threshold question of whether or not skins constitute consideration and therefore fall under the wide array of gambling laws we're discussing throughout this thread. For my money, I think this is a no brainer because the secondary market is prominent, permitted to exist, and skins have widely known value.

That being said, there isn't a case directly on point here so it's impossible to say for certain. I'd also add that it's not necessarily a safe assumption that simply because you are overage you are acting within the bounds of the law. Regulations vary significantly depending on jurisdiction and the type of wagering activity involved. In the US for example, internet based gambling is largely prohibited, even if you are over Agreed - great question.

That is part of what makes the gaming industry so tricky in the US. Not only are there federal laws to comply with, but every state has its own definition of gambling that must be taken into consideration. But, I agree with your premise about the cashing-out distinction. There is a recent court decision from Maryland — Mason v. I think this case will be instructive in the future. Skins, even with secondary markets, hold their value because of the gaming, which puts it squarely in the virtual world.

If the skins are virtual things of value, using them for gambling would be OK under most laws. CSGO Lotto " where they explicitly call out the monetary value of the skins being bet matter at all legally? Thank you guys for the reply. That was the biggest issue I have with all these problems that are arising.

If you keep the money inside steam, ie get rid of opskins and the rest that cash out, then its hard to say it's gambling. I look forward to seeing what comes about of the current lawsuits. I personally believe it will turn into a "valve enforce your rules agains opskins" type of outcome.

Sure, but we're not talking about just some in-game coin-flip process like World of Warcraft gear rolls or something. CSGO Lotto's entire profit model is centralized around the cash-to-skins aspect. If skins weren't worth money, they wouldn't exist, so obviously they themselves understand that skins are basically no different from chips. Also, it's hard to argue that when they straight up list cash value for everything being gambled on the site. Just as follow up the Dutch high court had a ruling about a runescape item and considered it a tangible good.

Could you see a similaar thing happen with skins? Let me take this a step further. You say that it's a no brainier that skins have a cash value. Are crates themselves then gambling? It is my understanding that one of the arguments in the complaint is that skins are being used like casino chips at a blackjack table. The gift cards from your arcade correct me if I'm wrong probably can't be used to continue playing.

As such, they differ fundamentally from a casino chip. Maybe, but we will see federal regulation or any of the fifty states press criminal charges. With this many children stolen from and lied to, by people bragging about their nice cars and houses they bought with the dirty money I'd expect the DOJ or a state attorney to get involved sooner rather than later.

And I think it's a very clear case of these skins being used as real money. Tmartn himself said it on Twitter. First major disagreement of the thread. I'm not nearly so confident. Answered a similar question above:.

Really depends on what you mean by legal consequences. For example, the class action suit against Valve is a civil one. Pretty much every government agency is understaffed and overworked. Whether or not a case is pursued is a matter of prioritization and allocation of limited resources. Remember that the fantasy sports industry was massive for years, but it took a highly public insider trading scandal and one of the largest ad buys in history to give the situation sufficient profile to warrant governmental action.

I think civil is a definite, as I've received over 75 emails from people wanting to sue TMartn specifically they are in his videos, losing to him. They used to think it was a cool video to have. Now it's proof of fraud in their minds. So if my firm doesn't lead that litigation, another firm will.

As for criminal, there are far fewer stories more "juicy" than stealing millions of dollars from children. Some DA in some state will view this as a great career growth opportunity or, more ideally, actually be a good person and want to stop this insanity. Either way, I think that's going to happen as well. I talked about the criminal aspect in response to your comment above. As for civil, I admit that's much harder to predict.

I've gotten a few similar emails myself, but I'm not sure I'll believe that litigation is real until it is filed. Then again, I'm a lawyer not a fortune teller, so what do I know. Fortune tellers know everything. They just aren't good with dates. Sometimes they mistime by hundreds of years Not sure if it is too late to be replied to but is there a good chance that an individual will win a case suing one of these guys?

What about non-Americans abroad who lost individual bets to these guys? There were 1 on 1 bets and jackpot style bets involving multiple people losing the same spin of the wheel to these guys. Could that too be considered illegal? I assumed that the people losing to these guys in the video were TMartn's confederates. The fact that these were people who had no idea they were playing against part-owners of the gambling site, and possibly even getting cheated by them changing things on the back-end Yeah, these guys are going down.

I had hoped that they had made the videos of the site closed-system, but evidently not. These guys seriously need to go. If you're jealous, why not do it yourself?! I've received over 75 emails from people wanting to sue TMartn specifically they are in his videos, losing to him. You should try and get verified real fast so its easier to find your replies, just a thought. Ty for the AMA. Just a quick one. Will it be possible for a company to be sued civil and charged criminal at the same time?

Or does the civil case need to take a backseat to the criminal case? Reddit needs to chill. Have an upvote for contributing constructively to the conversation and not just downvoting without leaving input. What makes you so convinced?

It is not the first time for Syndicate to run into problems with the FTC, but never really anything seem to came of it or at least nothing the public heard about. Also do you personally think the FTC will look into the reports and will not be easily fooled by removal of videos, change of descriptions etc? The state institutions in my country are very behind in those kind of things, is the FTC different?

You also mentioned state prosecutors but can they really do anything or be interested if most of these sites work from outside the US? I know nearly nothing about laws sadly. Just like to point out, TmarTn has already had his reputation tarnished before, he stole some content from a lower you tuber, and acted as a friend. He disabled comments, ratings, and a few months later everyone forgot. Obviously this is bigger, this time he reputation will probably be destroyed.

I don't have a question, just want to say keep fighting the good fight you guys. A credit to the gaming community! Do you think that people like mOE, Tmartn, and Syndicate will face legal consequences for their respective scandals? DA's go after juicy stories to build their careers, and this is that.

Thousands upon thousands of kids tricked into spending money on a site that they lied about not owning. There will be one state that goes all in on this, and that's all it takes. I really believe that. It's also just the friggin right thing to do.

Despite what everyone thinks, there ARE good lawyers out there. And I have a hard time believing they'll see how many children were lied to and cheated here and let it go. I too disagree with Bryce. No, I'm not a lawyer, and as Bryce knows I tend to put my nose out on certain issues -- in this case I am convinced there are major implications with regards to Tmartn and Syndicate. In my personal opinion these guys are actively promoting gambling to minors -- while misrepresenting their positions with the company.

This is all pretty clear. They are also operating an online most likely illegal based on our research gambling operation. The company is setup in Antigua to "protect" themselves how amateur -- yet at least one of them lives in the USA. Regulators are just waking up to this stuff, I talk to them all the time -- and the gov't can not only shut it down, but they can likely apply a retroactive punishment. I have little doubt an example will be set of these guys, and honestly it's about damn time.

Oh, and someone should tell them that the internet never forgets -- you can change and delete stuff all you want, but you're just implicating yourselves even more. The future will be a horrible place for people like that, people like you are like the pioneers, the dawn of a new era.

RIP Wildwest for online entertainers. There is zero chance we would support skin betting - unless Valve takes an official position and is willing to work with good operators who are licensed, regulated and who practice responsible gambling. Maybe I have misworded myself. I meant he better have a backup of the screenshots in case that hdd fries. Sorry for asking so late, but how reliable are screenshots these days? Do they, in this day and age of advanced technology, hold up as proper evidence?

I agree that if we continue down this path eventually this will rise to a level of prominence that attracts the attention of a governmental party in a position to bring some form of action, I just don't think we're there yet. Keep in mind the FTC went after Lord and Taylor for not disclosing it was paying for positive reviews and endorsements from brand ambassadors and magazines of one of its line of dresses. The FTC doesn't bring criminal prosecution, but they can make it feel that way, and it has some significant enforcement-like powers including asset seizure.

Real certified lawyers arguing on reddit, doesn't get better than that. Right now it is reported on scene sites from CS: As soon as mainstream media outlets cover it in-depth I'll change my stance, but right now it seems very unlikely that this level of noise will attract any attention.

This could help to get the story the necessary attraction. Though it also might do so alone, children gambling has such a nice sound to it. Is it juicy though? Right now it seems rather a niche story, if I would bring that up at any dinner party people would have no idea what I am talking about.

Once mainstream news start to talk about, or it really blows up on all social-media spheres then we can talk about juicy. But right now it is very limited to the CS: The facts are juicy in a court because the victims are kids and the sites are incredibly shady operators in a lot of cases at least , but it's not mainstream immersion level juicy.

At least not yet. That being said, I firmly believe it will be if we don't act collectively to do something about this problem, and soon. Hey Ryan, i was wondering what about folks who played on the site, i mean, a side from those who got lured by the videos, or, in addition to them, Some folks played on the site out of fun, or whatever may be the reason.

As consequence, with what have been revealed so far, Is it fair to allege that they were suffering unknowingly from unfair disadvantages?? What i mean by that, if the owners in fact gambled on their own site, what does it mean for all the other gamblers who went against them? We are looking into that currently.

It's definitely possible, but we don't want to waste people's time unless it's worth it. Are you in contact already with people with definite proof who directly gambled against the owners? I saw some small streamer actually commenting that he even was in one of I think Syndicates videos, those people should have a big chance on some form of retribution justice if they choose to sue, or not? A lot of people are looking towards Valve for a solution. What exactly could they and should they do?

I don't think the lawsuit against Valve will go anywhere, but it definitely has legal ground. While I expect it to settle quickly and not see a courtroom, keep the following in mind:. So if you own every skin, help run the websites that gamble them, and then turn those skins into quick and easy cash For what they can do?

They can stop letting these insanely popular websites use their marketplace so easily. I believe the person said, "Valve helps these sites" is becaue valve have place security measure and trading restriction on steam account but these Bots seem to not obtain these trade restrictions. Valve specifically whitelists the bots for all of the major gambling sites, so that they can operate without the restrictions that a normal level 0 steam account would have.

It's not like Valve only whitelisted gambling bots. There was about a week, maybe a year and a half ago, when those restriction were introduced that all of the gambling sites were forced to shut down because of nonfunctioning bots until valve stepped in and added a whitelist system for the gambling sites.

You realize bots have the exact same restrictions a normal user has. They must use mobile confirmations to complete trades just like anyone else. Developers found a way to do this automatically. They removed the restrictions after a week and replaced it with the mobile auth requirement. Apologies if you answered this already, but "Valve owns every single skin that exists. You don't buy the skins, you buy a license to use the skins.

This worries me in the long run of anything actually being done about this gambling situation though, because the way that I see it, Valve can state exactly what you stated there and say that skins have no monetary value, because nobody trades money for a skin, you're trading money for a right to use the skin within their guidelines - and as far as I know, Valve doesn't restrict gambling the "licenses" of their skins or trading those "licenses" between players, whether through a lost bet or other trade method.

I imagine the majority of this legal battle with the class action suit will revolve around proving the skins do hold real world monetary value, but I'm not a lawyer so what the heck do I know. Thanks for taking time to do this, I'm sure the community appreciates it a great deal. It's nice of you guys to help sort out confusion and false claims being spewed around lately. Valve has a number of options here.

One avenue that I've heard floated in a number of conversations is that they could restrict API access to certain types of sites—for example, they could prevent unlicensed, unregulated betting operators from being able to have users log in via steam.

I think this path makes sense, but it is not a simple undertaking. Open API access is a cornerstone of Valve's corporate philosophy and there are so many great third-party sites that are only able to exist because users can link their steam accounts.

This could even include betting sites. As I've said a number of times, the problem isn't betting, which can drive engagement around events, increasing viewership and a wide array of monetization opportunities. The problem is unlicensed, unregulated betting that operates in black markets, thrives on underage users, and creates the largest risk to competitive integrity.

CSGO has grown to its current prominence in large part due to betting, and I don't think eliminating all skin betting is necessary or a smart move. We do however desperately need to eliminate the bad actors from the space.

The entire industry needs to take a stand on this issue, not just Valve. Valve enacts a set of codes and ethics that betting websites have to follow. Stricter age gating, return ratios, etc.

Not sure about the wiping inventory part, but I love the idea of setting a good bar for every site to meet in order to be permitted to use the API.

Not a tax lawyer, sorry. If he doesn't, I'm definitely going to reach out to my tax attorney. The Finnish equilevant of IRS has made some statements considering the vitual currencies and "profits" from Internet games.

Basically if you sell something ingame, receive ingame currency for it and that currency is transfered into real money it's considered as profit which falls under the Income taxation law.

This was probably added due to the Diablo 3 real money auction house, because this seemed to spark most of the discussion around earnings through sales of virtual goods ingame.

On the Internet there are a large number of different types of games or programs that use their own internal virtual currencies and whose income is not dealt as lottery prizes. Internet-games and programs in this guide are called games, not depending on the nature of the program. Several of these games offer the opportunity for the player user of the program to earn virtual currency in its own interactive activities.

In some games, there is also the possibility that the virtual currency used within the game can be converted into real money, or the player can earn by selling and attribute they've developed to another player for exchange of real money. Individual games referred to in this guide and on the virtual currencies used in their gaming is considered as one and the same game as a whole.

Taxable income withdraw occurs when the virtual currency used in the game are changed outside the game for real money or money's worth as an operating property.

Revenue recognition takes place and the amount of taxable earnings determined in accordance with the virtual currency in the fair value of the moment of withdrawal. Money earned in-game is based on personal act of gaming and due to this accumulated earnings is by it's nature income based earnings.

If gaming has not accumulated taxable income, the loss of funds invested in the game or losses otherwise incurred gambling is not deductible for tax purposes. In this case, it comes to leisure activities expenditure, which will be held in living costs. Source for the Finns readings this: I'm not an expert of any of these fields: Taxation, Finnish law, personal investments, EU law or any other that require expertise other than playing games for fun and enjoyment.

Also not a tax lawyer, sorry. From what I've seen there is not an official IRS position either. Like any other kind of property. Personally, cryptocurrency is the analog I prefer for how we should think about skins, and not just because they're virtual. This is done not only because they're not money and thus the IRS can't quickly tag them as income, it's also because they can often be very difficult to keep track of.

I think the role of skins in the CSGO gambling problem is a lot like that. Casino chips are the other analogue that people like to draw with skins. As I understand it though I'm less clear on this , casino chips are treated more as a bond marking a loan owed from the casino to the player. Loans aren't generally considered income, since the understanding is that the money is not actually yours, you simply possess it momentarily. Chips are then not usually taxable for their inherent value until they are cashed out.

All this to say, I think the comparison to cryptocurrency is the stronger analogy if we want to think about how the IRS would hold if asked to offer guidance on it. This to me is especially important because now that skins have a means of redemption into real money through opskins, they can be considered "things of value" like cryptocurrencies are. The bigger snag seems to be ownership. Under the chips analogy, it makes more sense: But that's not "real" currency; it's all within Valve's system.

So we have to argue instead that skins are actually "owned" and not "licensed" as seems to be the case. That or somehow get a court to say it's a distinction without a difference. IRS tax treatment and as follows general legal treatment of skins would probably follow their approach to cryptocurrencis: Oh man this changes a lot jurisdiction to jurisdiction. It's a really intelligent question, but one to answer intelligently back in this kind of forum.

At this point I use your guys' AMAs just to make public our one-on-one conversations about similar issues. This will be no different. Feel free to recycle things we've talked about before or introduce new ideas you have about it.

Again love you all. Jeff we haven't actually spoken much, but thank you for your work with industry partners, and I hope to hear more from you whether in this AMA or otherwise. Everyone needs to clean up together.

You have to say it in the video, not the description. And you have to say it at the beginning of the video usually. It becomes much worse when you're the damn owner and pretending they found you on twitter. I know it's scary for a video game attorney to poke the biggest beast around. But it's important this stops. From the first time I met Ian Smith the Commission of ESIC , we discussed our attempts at Unikrn to safeguard competitive integrity and the necessity for getting as many key stakeholders involved as possible.

At the end of the day, we need publishers, organizers, teams, players, wagering operators all at the same table having the same conversation and leveraging their collective knowledge and resources to solve this problem. Our ability to age gate varies according the privacy laws and third-party databases available to help during the account verification process.

These processes exist in every jurisdiction that allows online wagering. They are cumbersome for the operators and sometimes for the user, but they should be. Hi there, im seen in the video "losing" to TmartN when logged into the bots been pointed to talk with you from afew people who have wrote articles on gamur etc my Twitter is 4llsopp so if it needs to be a long conversation we can do it on DM.

Seems like you're on the right path. Can't say I know the UK tracks well enough to be too helpful here, sorry! Want to help the industry I love. I've personally gotten over 75 emails of people who lost to TMartn and Syndicate who want to sue them for fraud, among other charges.

. Сайт новой версии CMS Joomla 2.5. На сайте можно скачать шаблоны joomla 2.5 и другие расширения.